|
STAR NAMES (Latin information courtesy of Mary McLoghry) Some time ago, I overheard two members discussing star names. They were wondering why the constellation reference in a star name was different to the constellation name, e.g., Alpha Doradis and Dorado. Astronomy is nothing if not multi-lingual, and this is a good example. As we all know, bright STARS are named using the GREEK alphabet in descending order of brightness. Most CONSTELLATION names are of LATIN origin, or have been Latinised, (so as to fit the conventions). Latin is a very precise language, much like German, and there are specific word forms to denote different functions. These functions are given in tablular form known as a declension that looks like this :-
For the purpose of this discourse, only two cases are relevant the Nominative and the Genitive. Nominative is the same as Nominate to name. Thus the nominative case is used to name a constellation and thus it becomes the subject of the event. Star names are given in the format star A belonging to (or OF) constellation B. Therefore, we have to use the Possessive or Genitive case for the constellation name. There are five major declension forms, indicated by the way a word ends, as follows :- First Declension:
Nominative singular ends in a. Feminine. (Sorry, but I cant think of any astronomical examples for 4th and 5th declensions.) When the constellation name consists of two words, e.g., Ursa
Major, then both words have to be given the genitive
case. Similarly, when the constellation is a plural name,
such as Gemini, then the plural form of the genitive
case is used. There are other word-endings not listed
above, but their declensions would fit into one of these five
groups.
|
|